education20

 

FrontPage

Page history last edited by Debbie Loomis 9 mos ago

FundingFundingFunding Edit

EDUCATION 2.0

If you had a magicwand to change education, what would you do?

 

This is a wiki that explores the thoughts and ideas of educators that would like to be on the cutting edge of change

Please see side bar for questions and concerns that we face in the 21st century as educators

Please offer suggestions and solutions.That is the only way we can move forward.

These questions were posed to me for my Arne Duncan meeting on January 21, 2009

 

If you want to contact me, beatechie@gmail.com (Carol Broos)

 

I would like to have more technology money for my classroom.  As I have been able to integrate CPS response system, YouTube lang. arts clips, a wikipage, and laptops from our 1 portable school laptop cart, I have had better student engagement than in years past.  Second, I would like to have more funding to buy young adult literature to read with students.  Generally, students like to read, but want to read what interests them.  We need to plug into that first.  Then we can push them to move toward more challenging literature.  As a society, it is in our best interest to cultivate discerning readers.  The audience of students I am referring to is the "standard" public education high school student.  I have found that honors and AP students will read whatever I put before them, at least for the grade, but they are the minority where I teach.

 

 

There is a huge lack of funding for country's educational system.  There are so many mandates that are unfunded or partially funded.  There is not a consistency for  educational programing, educational philosophy, educational training, or teacher licensing.  I do not want federal control but I do think states should work harder at recognizing each other's teacher training programs.  Children and student learning should be the focus and instead it has become hindered by bureaucracy.  Then in the February 2009 edition of Reader's Digest we can read about the millions of tax payer dollars wasted on pork barrel spending and we wonder why our country is not competing globally educationally in some realms?  It is very sad.  We need someone in the White House that will really focus in on student achievement and put forth the funding to make this happen!

 

Comments (13)

profile picture

Kelly Hines said

at 4:29 pm on Jan 7, 2009

Thanks for putting this together and thanks to K. Jarrett for sharing with his Twitter PLN. I will definitely be adding soon :)

profile picture

Karla Olson said

at 11:28 pm on Jan 9, 2009

I, too, say thank you, and I, too, got here via Kevin Jarrett's blog.

profile picture

Pam Friedman said

at 10:06 am on Jan 10, 2009

Hi Carol,
I found your wiki through Kevin Jarett's blog, too. I am a NYC GCT - '07 cohort. What an honor to be included in a select group of teachers speaking to Arne Duncan! I think that in order for education to change, we need to allow our students a voice. I plan to set up a blog for my students and have them answer the question: "If you could talk to Mr. Duncan, what would you like to say?" I will then link to the blog from here.
Thanks for setting up this wiki.

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 9:50 pm on Jan 10, 2009

I've been trying to add some responses to the topics on the right, but still can't figure that out, so I"m going to put much info as comment.
I'm a senior staff member at an education advocacy group in San Antonio TX and I"m going to first drop in the overall institutional change framework we operate from. Because of the 2000 limit I'm going to do it in several sections.
Quality Schools Action Framework : IDRA’s Quality Schools Action Framework shows how we can strengthen public education for all students. The framework – or theory of change – is grounded in school reform research and practice. Developed by IDRA executive director Dr. María “Cuca” Robledo Montecel, it asserts that:Coalition-building and community capacity-building are critical, though often neglected, change strategies in improving graduation rates. One hundred percent graduation and preparation for sucess should be our goals for all children and the measure of our success. While critical for students who are at immediate risk of dropping out, discrete dropout prevention programs cannot change the systems that give rise to risk in the first place.
Definitions
Fair Funding – Availability of funds in a school district to support a quality educational program for all students.
Governance Efficacy – The capacity of administrative and supervisory personnel to deliver quality educational services to all students, along with the policymaking and pro-active support of a school board to hold on to every student.
Parent and Community Engagement – Creating partnerships based on respect and a shared goal of academic success and integrating parents and community members into the decisionmaking processes of the school.
Student Engagement – School environment and activities that value students and incorporate them into the learning process and other social activities within the school with academic achievement as a result.

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 9:50 pm on Jan 10, 2009

(It left out the graphic) so to see the whole thing go to: http://www.idra.org/School_Holding_Power/Quality_Schools_Action_Framework/

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 9:51 pm on Jan 10, 2009


Teaching Quality – The preparation of teachers and the placement of teachers in their fields of study. Teaching is informed by continual professional development. Also the practices that teachers use in the classroom to deliver comprehensible instruction that prepares all students to meet academic goals and ensures that no child is left behind or drops out of school.
Curriculum Quality and Access – The educational programs of study, materials and other learning resources such as technology and their accessibility to all students. Also relates to assessment and accountability – the school practices related to fair and unbiased assessment of students and degree that schools take responsibility for the academic success of all students.

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 9:55 pm on Jan 10, 2009

At IDRA, I direct a Parent Information Resource Center for Texas. I'm especially conncerned about Family Leadership in Education. I would like the new ESEA regs to increase the parent involvement $$$ and also to support greater consultation and have districts document effective outreach to all families and engagement of families in all key aspects of the academic work of the schools. See my blog Parent Leadership in Education http://parentleadershipined.blogspot.com/

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 10:08 pm on Jan 10, 2009

Key principles to consider in recommendations for funding parent involvement activities:
IDRA Family Leadership in Education – Principles

Principle 1: Families can be their children’s strongest advocates.

Principle 2: Families of different race, ethnicity, language and class are equally valuable.

Principle 3: Families care about their children’s education and are to be treated with respect, dignity and value.

Principle 4: Within families, many individuals play a role in the children’s education.

Principle 5: Family leadership is most powerful at improving education for all children when collective efforts create solutions for the common good.

Principle 6: Families, schools, and communities, when drawn together, become a strong, sustainable voice to protect the rights of all children.

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 10:12 pm on Jan 10, 2009

My wishlist blog entry of Jan 2 http://parentleadershipined.blogspot.com/2009/01/wish-list-to-obama-for-public-education.html
It is based on our experience in supporting family leadership in education and also our view of institutional transformation.

VISTA-CHIPS (Volunteers in Service to America’s Children in Public Schools) Teachers for Family& Student Leadership working with schools, student leadership & parent leadership in education -- campus based but also community-organization connected.

Parents-in-Education (PIE-ChIPS) Outreach Workers
Tech-savvy promotoras (community outreach workers) with a dual school and community organizational base. Primary tasks: 1) to conduct home-visits, 2) identify and nurture emerging parent leaders & 3) identify & mobilize neighborhood and school feeder-pattern assets in support of the academic achievement of all students.

Community Technology Centers for Children in Public Schools (CTC/ ChIPS) Partnering Community Based Organizations, Public Schools, & Businesses into partnerships that support excellent neighborhood public schools for all children.

Community Technology Center - Community Technology Access Projects CTCs partner with existing public school computer labs and also provide new community center labs to facilitate and increase computer & internet use by the communities that have limited access to computers and the internet. These new CTCs would be staffed by the Parent-Leadership in Education outreach workers listed above.

MOre recommendation in the next comment

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 10:12 pm on Jan 10, 2009

Barrios in Technology / Children in Public Schools
(BIT-ChIPS) Parent Leadership Project Providing technology in homes without computers and internet access – Multi-pronged project, managed out of new & improved Community Technology Centers, to identify computer presence in Title 1-school feeding- pattern neighborhoods, provide computers and fast internet access in homes, not just based on lack of technology but as a reciprocal offering to documented family leadership in education and support of student academic success in the home.

profile picture

Aurelio Montemayor said

at 10:17 pm on Jan 10, 2009

My organization, IDRA, was established over 35 years ago with a single educational change purpose: to inform the people of Texas that we had an inequitable and unjust system of funding our public schools. We have expanded beyond the original objectives but have kept the same vision: to make public schools work for all children.
With the new administration and congress we have an opportunity to take what we have learned about educational transformation, including what worked and what didn't work with NCLB, and accelerate the transformation of our schools without using punitive measures with students and supporting our best and brightest educators.
One NCLB issue that is important to us: disaggregation of student test scores and achievement levels. Schools must continue to be accountable for all students and present data clearly and transparently to the community.

profile picture

Dixie Dellinger said

at 5:59 pm on Jan 11, 2009

I am recently retired after teaching English in high school and community college for 38 years. The current aim in American education seems to be "Educate all to the same level," although the level is not specified and the effort, though massive, is not succeeding.
I would like the aim to be "Educate all students to their greatest INDIVIDUAL potential." A colleague put it this way: Advance Individual Human Potential, or acronymically, AIHP.
In order to do this -- and it can be done -- with differing populations of students, American teachers need LESS government control in the form of regulation, oversight, and standardization of testing and curricula. Education is at the opposite end from the financial sector which needs more oversight and more regulation with enforcement.
American teachers, to work effectively with their students, need what this country is all about: Freedom to be and do their best. A little trust and independence would go a long way toward bringing about change we can believe in.

profile picture

Carol Arcomano said

at 6:44 pm on Jan 11, 2009

Hi Dixie - Wow - 38 years - those were the days... when students wanted to learn. "Educate all students to their greatest INDIVIDUAL potential." What a beautiful thing - whether it's music, art, or academics - everyone marches to a different beat of the drum - "mulitple intelligences". It's too bad the govenment doesn't see it the same way we do - instead they create programs that make us regress and work towards a goal we've always worked towards.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.